Footfairy (2020) Ending Explained

Max Framewell Profile Image
By Max Framewell
July 20, 2025

TL;DR:
Footfairy is a 2020 Malayalam psychological thriller directed by K. M. Chaitanya, starring Prithviraj Sukumaran as CBI officer Vikram, who investigates a series of murders linked to a serial killer known as the "Footfairy." The killer targets women, amputating their feet and leaving cryptic clues. The ending reveals Vikram himself as the killer, suffering from dissociative identity disorder (DID), with his alternate personality committing the crimes. The film concludes with Vikram being arrested, but his mental state leaves lingering questions about justice and culpability. The twist is shocking but divisive, with some praising its boldness and others critiquing its execution.


Detailed Explanation of the Ending

The climax of Footfairy hinges on a classic psychological thriller twist: the detective hunting the killer is, unknowingly, the killer himself. Throughout the film, CBI officer Vikram is portrayed as a meticulous investigator haunted by past trauma-specifically, witnessing his mother's suicide after she lost her legs in an accident. This trauma manifests as dissociative identity disorder (DID), where Vikram's repressed rage and grief take the form of an alternate personality, the "Footfairy," who targets women and amputates their feet as a twisted homage to his mother's suffering. The reveal is gradual, with Vikram discovering his own involvement through forensic evidence and psychological evaluations, culminating in a chilling confrontation with his own reflection.

The final act sees Vikram attempting to suppress his alter ego, but it's too late-the police, led by his colleague Aarya (Mia George), piece together the truth. In a tense standoff, Vikram is subdued and arrested, though his fractured psyche leaves him oscillating between denial and horrified realization. The film's last shot lingers on Vikram's face, his expression a mix of anguish and eerie calm, suggesting his alter ego might still lurk beneath the surface. This ambiguity underscores the film's central theme: the duality of human nature and the blurred line between justice and madness.

Unresolved Questions & Possible Answers

  1. Was Vikram aware of his actions at any point?

    • Possible Answer: No, his DID created a complete dissociation, making his alter ego operate independently.
    • Alternative Interpretation: Subconsciously, he might have sensed the truth but repressed it to avoid guilt.
  2. Why did the Footfairy target specific women?

    • Possible Answer: They symbolized his mother, either through physical resemblance or their perceived "imperfections."
    • Alternative Interpretation: The killings were random, with the foot motif being the only consistent link to his trauma.
  3. Could Vikram's condition have been treated earlier?

    • Possible Answer: Yes, if his trauma had been addressed through therapy, but his stoic persona prevented him from seeking help.
    • Alternative Interpretation: His disorder was too deeply ingrained, making intervention futile.
  4. What happens to Vikram after his arrest?

    • Possible Answer: He's institutionalized, with his alter ego potentially resurfacing.
    • Alternative Interpretation: He stands trial, but his mental state complicates legal proceedings.

Personal Opinion on the Ending & Film

Footfairy's ending is audacious but polarizing. The twist, while not entirely original (echoing films like Fight Club or Psycho), is effective due to Prithviraj's compelling performance. His portrayal of Vikram's unraveling psyche is nuanced, blending vulnerability with menace. However, the film's pacing suffers in the middle act, with repetitive investigative sequences dulling the suspense. The psychological explanation for the Footfairy's actions feels somewhat rushed, relying heavily on exposition in the finale.

That said, the film's exploration of trauma and identity is thought-provoking. The ending's ambiguity-whether Vikram is truly "cured" or if his alter ego remains-adds layers to the narrative. It's a bold choice to make the protagonist the villain, challenging the audience's empathy. While Footfairy isn't flawless, its gripping finale and ethical dilemmas make it a memorable entry in Malayalam thriller cinema.


Final Verdict: Footfairy delivers a shocking twist that recontextualizes the entire story, though its execution could have been tighter. The film's strength lies in its psychological depth and Prithviraj's performance, but uneven pacing holds it back from greatness. If you enjoy mind-bending thrillers, it's worth a watch-just don't expect a perfectly polished narrative.