The Last Broadcast (1998) Ending Explained

Max Framewell Profile Image
By Max Framewell
June 15, 2025

TL;DR:
The Last Broadcast (1998) is a found-footage horror mockumentary that follows the investigation into the murders of two public access TV hosts during a supposed hunt for the Jersey Devil. The film's ending reveals that the documentary filmmaker, Steven Avkast, is the actual killer, framing an innocent man. The twist is delivered through manipulated footage and unreliable narration, challenging the audience's perception of truth. The movie concludes with Steven's disappearance, leaving his guilt ambiguous but heavily implied. The film's meta-commentary on media manipulation and the blurred line between reality and fiction makes its ending particularly unsettling.


Detailed Explanation of the Ending:
The ending of The Last Broadcast subverts expectations by revealing that the seemingly objective documentary filmmaker, Steven Avkast, is the true murderer. Throughout the film, Steven presents himself as an impartial investigator reconstructing the events leading to the deaths of Jim Suerd and Locus Wheeler, hosts of the public access show Fact or Fiction. The documentary style lulls the audience into trusting Steven's narrative, making the twist all the more shocking. In the final moments, it's revealed that Steven meticulously edited footage to frame an innocent man, Rein Clackin, for the murders. This revelation forces viewers to question everything they've seen, as the film's "truth" is exposed as a carefully constructed lie.

The climax occurs when Steven's deception unravels through a series of inconsistencies in the footage. A critical scene shows Rein Clackin, the accused, being interviewed in prison, where he vehemently denies involvement. Later, hidden footage exposes Steven's manipulation, including spliced audio and selective editing. The film's faux-documentary format amplifies the horror, as it mirrors real-world media's ability to distort facts. Steven's final monologue, delivered while he films himself in a mirror, hints at his narcissism and god complex, suggesting he killed Jim and Locus to create a sensational story. The movie ends with Steven vanishing, leaving his ultimate fate-and the full extent of his crimes-open to interpretation.

Unresolved Questions and Possible Answers:
1. Did Steven act alone, or was there a larger conspiracy?
- The film implies Steven acted alone, driven by a desire for fame and control.
- Alternatively, some theorists suggest the Jersey Devil cult (mentioned earlier) could have influenced him.

  1. What happened to Steven after he disappeared?

    • He may have fled to avoid prosecution, continuing his manipulative schemes elsewhere.
    • Some fans speculate he was killed by forces linked to the Jersey Devil legend, adding a supernatural layer.
  2. How much of the footage was real vs. fabricated?

    • Most of it was likely staged by Steven, given his confession.
    • A few scenes (like Rein's prison interview) might be genuine, making the deception more insidious.
  3. Why did Steven target Jim and Locus specifically?

    • They were easy targets due to their paranormal investigations.
    • Personal jealousy or a grudge could have motivated him.

Personal Opinion on the Ending and the Film:
The Last Broadcast is a criminally underrated precursor to The Blair Witch Project, and its ending is a masterclass in psychological horror. The twist works because it exploits the audience's trust in documentaries, making us complicit in Steven's deception. The film's low-budget aesthetic enhances its realism, and the final reveal lingers like a slow-burning nightmare. However, the pacing can feel uneven, and some viewers might find the mockumentary format dated. Despite this, the ending's ambiguity and meta-commentary on media manipulation remain chillingly relevant today. It's a flawed but fascinating film that rewards careful viewing, especially for fans of unreliable narrators and psychological thrillers.

Final Thoughts:
The ending of The Last Broadcast forces viewers to confront the dangers of unchecked storytelling and the ease with which truth can be fabricated. By implicating the filmmaker himself, the movie delivers a potent critique of sensationalism and the cult of personality. While not perfect, its innovative structure and unsettling finale cement its place as a cult classic in the found-footage genre. Whether Steven's fate is left unresolved by design or oversight, it adds to the film's lingering sense of unease-a reminder that some horrors are all too human.